Science as an open enterprise

ScienceAsAnOpenEnterprise.pngAt the Software Sustainability Institute, we're interested in doing science properly and we're particularly interested in the findings of others investigating this area. Over the last year, Research Councils UK in partnership with JISC, the Royal Society and Sciencewise-ERC, have commissioned a public dialogue exercise on open data, which aims to engage the public with issues around open data to potentially inform future policies in this area.

The final report from the working group has now been published, along with case studies of data use and data repositories.

The report demonstrates the wide diversity of scientific data, as well as the changing landscape of computational and data science, and is an excellent overview of the area.

Six key areas for action are highlighted in the report:

  1. Scientists need to be more open among themselves and with the public and media
  2. Greater recognition needs to be given to the value of data gathering, analysis and communication
  3. Common standards for sharing information are required to make it widely usable
  4. Publishing data in a reusable form to support findings must be mandatory
  5. More experts in managing and supporting the use of digital data are required
  6. New software tools need to be developed to analyse the growing amount of data being gathered

The role for the Institute must be to both help bring about the culture change required to address these areas for action, and support the software developers who are providing the tools which make it easier enact these changes.

More information on the Royal Society website.

Using a new software product

Using a new software product as a lever for process reengineering usually fails. As software developers who support research, let's not be too quick to take sides in discussions about how science should proceed.

The panel members who produced the report are distinguished. But none of them have as the main responsibility of their current post the conduct of research. This report is an attempt to change the practice of the scientific community from outside or above. That's OK - these are people who have earned the right to an opinion on these questions.

Projects that develop software to support the practices of a community are more likely to succeed if they support the actual practices, not ideal ones.

Chris Morris

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <q> <img> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <thead> <tfoot>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readable fashion or (if JavaScript is enabled) replaced with a spamproof clickable link.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.